Trump Demands Hamas Disarm Amid Brutal Gaza Crackdown
Trump demands Hamas disarm as the militant group launches a harsh campaign against alleged collaborators in the Gaza Strip, deepening tensions in the war-torn region.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump warned that the United States would take steps to disarm Hamas “violently” if the group refused to surrender its weapons. Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Trump said Hamas must disarm within “a reasonable period of time,” though he did not specify a deadline.
His comments follow shocking footage circulating online showing Hamas executions and violent crackdowns across Gaza City. The videos, verified by independent analysts, revealed public shootings of suspected informants as Hamas seeks to reassert control since the recent US-brokered ceasefire.
Hamas Moves Against Alleged Collaborators
Hamas has accused several groups and families of cooperating with Israel and vowed to crush “lawlessness.” Witnesses reported armed fighters parading through Gaza’s streets, executing men accused of espionage and intimidating rivals. One widely shared clip showed Hamas fighters lining up eight men before a crowd and shooting them, while bystanders shouted “collaborators.”
Local residents expressed deep concern over the chaos. A lawyer in Gaza condemned the killings, calling them “lawlessness, not resistance.” Activists warned that executions without fair trials violate international law and only fuel fear among civilians.
Clans Challenge Hamas Control
Experts note that Hamas’s crackdown is partly aimed at reasserting dominance over rival clans such as the Dughmush family, which has long clashed with Hamas over control of smuggling routes and local militias. These armed groups, some reportedly supported by Israel, have expanded their power as Hamas’s authority weakened during the conflict.
Political analyst Professor Fawaz Gerges from the London School of Economics explained that Hamas is using its internal security forces to “mobilize and consolidate control” over Gaza. He added that without restoring security, “no aid or stability can return to Gaza.”
US Reaction and Regional Tension
Despite his tough talk, Trump’s Gaza statement acknowledged the complex situation. He said Hamas’s show of force was “approved for a period of time” to prevent chaos as millions of displaced residents return home. Analysts suggest Washington quietly tolerates some Hamas activity to maintain order following Israel’s withdrawal.
As the Gaza conflict enters another volatile phase, the balance of power between Hamas, rival militias, and Israel remains fragile. For many Palestinians, the immediate concern is survival amid insecurity, damaged infrastructure, and the struggle for basic needs.
The call that Trump demands Hamas disarm underscores the U.S.’s renewed interest in shaping post-war Gaza, but whether Hamas complies—or escalates—remains uncertain.
The situation in Gaza remains one of the most volatile and complex crises in the Middle East, as Trump demands Hamas disarm while the group intensifies its control over the region through forceful crackdowns. Recent footage of public executions and violence against alleged collaborators paints a grim picture of lawlessness in the Gaza Strip, raising international concern over the direction of Hamas’s internal policies and the future of regional peace.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s Gaza statement underscores the renewed American interest in reestablishing stability following months of conflict. His call for Hamas to surrender its weapons “within a reasonable period of time” signals a hardline approach that contrasts with Washington’s previous stance of indirect engagement. By warning that the U.S. could act “violently” if disarmament does not occur, Trump has reignited debate about the limits of foreign influence in Gaza’s internal affairs.
Meanwhile, the Hamas crackdown on so-called collaborators reveals the group’s determination to reassert dominance over Gaza after losing ground during Israel’s military operations. Analysts suggest that Hamas’s actions are also aimed at dismantling rival clans such as the Dughmush family, who have long competed for control of smuggling networks and resources. Reports indicate that some of these groups may have received backing from Israeli forces, further complicating the web of alliances and hostilities within the Strip.
The Gaza conflict has also exposed deep divisions within Palestinian society. Many civilians have condemned the recent public executions, describing them as violations of justice and humanity. Residents fear that such actions, carried out without trial or evidence, could set a dangerous precedent for future governance in Gaza. Lawyers, activists, and humanitarian observers have called for transparency, urging Hamas to prioritize rebuilding infrastructure and social trust rather than relying on intimidation and violence.
Experts, including Professor Fawaz Gerges of the London School of Economics, emphasize that sustainable peace in Gaza depends on establishing security before governance. Without disarmament, he argues, aid cannot flow effectively, and communities cannot rebuild their lives. This reflects a harsh reality: stability in Gaza may rely on the very forces that many blame for its instability.
As Middle East tensions remain high and the Israel Hamas ceasefire grows fragile, the path toward peace appears uncertain. The demand that Trump makes Hamas disarm symbolizes more than a political statement—it represents a test of leadership, diplomacy, and humanity in one of the world’s most enduring conflicts.
